Asia Travel News Commentary, Reviews, and Insights

While the US-based airlines have begun charging for checked luggage, Asia-based airlines have not yet gone to the that extreme. However, the local airlines may have more restrictive luggage allowances for their domestic flights than the internationial flights you take to and from the US to get there. The most typical restriction on domestic flights in Asia is 20 Kilograms (44 lbs.) per person, compared to a 2-bag, 32 kg. (70 lbs.) for international flights to get to Asian gateway cities from the US and Canada.

Here’s a breakdown of the domestic luggage allowances for different airlines in Asia:

China:

All Domestic Airlines

Carry-on baggage
The maximum Carry-on baggage allowance for each economy class passenger is 5kg. First class passengers can have 2 pieces of carry on luggage. All other passengers can carry on only one piece. The size may not exceed 20×40x55cm. Carry on baggage in excess of the limit is subject to an excess baggage fee and must be carried as checked baggage.

Check-in Baggage
Adults and children are entitled to a free checked baggage allowance of 40kg, for first class, 30kg, for business class, and 20kg, for economy class while traveling on domestic airlines in China. No free baggage allowance is granted to infants. Groups traveling together are able to combine their baggage allowance if they check in together.

SE Asia:

Thai Airways (luggage restrictions)

Checked Baggage:
Economy Class passengers:           20 kg. (44 lbs.)
Royal Executive Class passengers: 30 kg. (66 lbs.)
Royal First Class passengers:         40 kg. (88 lbs.)

Royal Orchid Plus Gold Card members are entitled to check an additional 20 kg. (44 lbs.). Royal Orchid Plus Silver Card members can check an additional 10 kg. (22 lbs.) of luggage.

Infants (not occupying a seat) are allowed 10 kg. (22 lbs.) excluding one fully-collapsible child stroller, pushchair, or infant-carrying basket.

Cabin Baggage: Maximum weight is 7 Kg. (15.4 lbs).

Bangkok Air (and Siem Reap Airways) (luggage restrctions)
Checked Baggage: Maximum weight is 20 kg. for adult and child / 10 kg. for an infant
Cabin Baggage: Maximum weight is 5 kg. (11 lbs).

Vietnam Airlines (luggage restrictions)
Checked Baggage:
Business Class: maximum 30 kg. of checked baggage (number of bags isn’t regulated).
Economy Class: maximum 20 kg. of checked baggage (number of bags isn’t regulated).

Cabin Baggage: 1 piece, 7 Kg. (15.4 lbs) in economy class; 2 pieces, 7 kg. (15.4 lbs) each piece.

Bhutan:

Druk Air
Checked Baggage:
Economy: maximum 20 Kg. (44 lbs) subject to 2 suitcase-sized pieces per passenger.
Executive: maximum 30 Kg. (66 lbs) subject to 2 suitcase-sized pieces per passenger.

Cabin Baggage: 1 bag, the weight of which is included in the overall weight restrictions.

India

Jet AirwaysChecked Baggage:
Economy: 25 kg. (55 lbs) per person, largest bag no more than 32 Kg. (70.4 lbs)
Premiere: 35 kg. (77 lbs) per person, largest bag no more than 32 Kg. (70.4 lbs)

Cabin Baggage:
1 hand bag, 7 kg. (15 lbs.), plus 1 laptop bag or purse

Kingfisher Airlines

Checked Baggage:
Kingfisher First: 35 kg/77 lb
Kingfisher Class: 25 kg/55 lb
Kingfisher Red: 15 kg/33 lb

Cabin Baggage:
1 hand bag, 7 kg. (15 lbs.), plus 1 laptop bag or purse

Indian Airlines

Myanmar

All domestic airlines:
Maximum Baggage Allowance: 20 Kg. (44 lbs) per person

The article below illustrates how corrupt officials can and will take advantage of the demand for tourism in developing countries. Milo Anderson, a journalist and recent graduate of the University of Washington in Seattle, spent a month in Cambodia last January as part of a study-abroad program looking at social work there. After the program, he stayed for another week to research this story and witness the poverty and suffering caused by the overzealous developers, corrupt officials, and police. His article has also been printed in the Northwest Asian Weekly. Thanks Milo and Northwest Asian Weekly for letting me reprint it here!

——————————–
    The white sands of Otres Beach sit two miles south of Sihanoukville, Cambodia.  It’s less crowded than the larger beaches closer to downtown.  Tourists from Europe, Australia and the United States, along with Cambodians on vacation, come to enjoy the sun and the warm ocean and the small, open-air, thatched-roof bars and restaurants that line the sand.  At night, roman candles and Christmas lights reflect off the black water.  

    Of the 100 families that lived there, 80 remain by the side of the road, within sight of the concrete barrier surrounding the site of their old village and a few hundred feet from the tourists on Otres Beach.  They have nowhere else to go.  

    The evictions in Spean Chhes are one example of a widespread problem in Cambodia.  The Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO), has documented dozens of cases of land grabbing by wealthy, well-connected individuals and companies throughout the country. 

    Cambodia is one of the poorest countries in the world, with a long history of violence and famine.  In the past two decades it has become a major recipient of international aid money and has developed a tourism and garment industry alongside the traditional subsistence agriculture still practiced in much of the country.  Economic development has raised land prices. 

    Manfred Hornung, a monitoring consultant with LICADHO, said it’s easy to see why Spean Chhes, located next to an attractive tourist destination, was targeted for development.  “It’s prime real estate.” 

    Hornung said Phung Ravy, wife of a parliamentary advisor, went to Spean Chhes and offered the villagers money for their land.  When they refused, she claimed to already hold the titles.  Ravy could not be reached for comment, but Hornung said her nephew told LICADHO staff his aunt took this money and bribed government officials to act on her behalf. 

    Hornung said the nephew was trying to mediate the dispute, and thought the story would demonstrate his aunt’s good intentions.  “The most dangerous thing here is that people take it [corruption] for granted,” he said. 

    According to Horm Theurn, who cleared land for a farm in Spean Chhes 15 years ago with her family, when the police and soldiers came to demolish the village they said “It’s your fault because before when we offered you money, you didn’t take it.  Now we take the land for free.” 

    She said she has no idea what will happen to her and the other families.  She said they want to return to their land, but they are afraid they will be shot. 

    Villagers were also worried about their relatives in prison.  Fourteen men were charged for fighting the police and soldiers with slingshots, rocks and glass bottles.  One man escaped arrest, five were acquitted, one who used a machete was sentenced to four months and the remaining seven men were given the lightest sentences possible. 

    But when the prosecutor appealed their convictions, the men had to stay in jail awaiting their new trial.  After intense lobbying by LICADHO and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Appeals Court finally heard the case on April 3, and the men were released a week later. 

    Hornung said the criminal cases against the villagers were meant to intimidate them and distract them from pursuing a civil case to get their land back, and it’s a pattern he sees in other land disputes.  “The government is very successful in keeping people busy getting out of prison,” he said. 

    According to a 2001 land law, if someone has possessed land uncontested for five or more years before the law was passed, they have the right to claim ownership before a cadastral commission. 

    However, according to Hornung, no court or commission has ever addressed the issue of land ownership in Spean Chhes.  And since residents were not allowed to remove their possessions before their houses were destroyed, they lost documents that may have proved how long they lived there. 

    “We don’t talk about the rule of law in this office,” Hornung said.  “It’s just practicalities.” 

    The governor of Sihanoukville, Say Hak, who organized the eviction, could not be reached for comment.  The information officer for Cambodia’s National Authority for Resolution of Land Disputes, Chum Bun Rong, was unable to say who resolved the question of ownership of the land, or how they reached that conclusion.  He also didn’t know what the government plans to do about the villagers living by the road. 

    The humanitarian organization M’Lop Tapang provides basic medical assistance to the evicted villagers.  Setha Thouch, a team leader with M’Lop Tapang, said the children have been hardest hit by the evictions. 

    During the summer rainy season, Thouch said, the ditches fill with water and many children develop skin diseases.  In the dry winter months cars, trucks and tourists riding in tuk-tuks—small three-wheel taxis—create clouds of red dust that cover everything.  Respiratory diseases are common, he said. 

    Hornung said the unwillingness of Cambodia’s leaders to respect their own laws undercuts the mission of aid agencies. 

    “They knew how to make a living there,” said Hornung.  “Now they are slum dwellers.  This is man-made.  This is not the poverty in this country.” 

 –Milo Anderson
——————————-